(Beta Version. Parental Alert.)
Today I read that a woman who has been sheltering in a sanctuary church is being fined over $450,000 by ICE. In another article I read that ICE has sent notices to other similarly situated immigrants in five states. The fines are all between $300,000 and $500,000. I would venture to guess that all of these individuals are judgment proof, although the existence of the liens will make it more difficult for them to remain in the U.S. The church, on the other hand, is not judgment proof. They have something to lose. This is just the ball getting rolling, folks. It's going to be a rough ride.
Today I read that a woman who has been sheltering in a sanctuary church is being fined over $450,000 by ICE. In another article I read that ICE has sent notices to other similarly situated immigrants in five states. The fines are all between $300,000 and $500,000. I would venture to guess that all of these individuals are judgment proof, although the existence of the liens will make it more difficult for them to remain in the U.S. The church, on the other hand, is not judgment proof. They have something to lose. This is just the ball getting rolling, folks. It's going to be a rough ride.
This
is how they are going to get us, we who fall into one of the
categories for “other.” Fines, or other monetary assessments, are
a nice, clean way to destroy someone's life without the trouble of
harming them or incarcerating them. This is my greatest fear.
So
far it's all been very tentative. When people demonstrated at Trump's
inauguration, there were charges filed, and a lot of good, upright
citizens were arrested and charged with “illegal assembly,” or
“failure to disperse,” or something. As is now routine, the
situation immediately gave rise to creative new charges, backed up by
new laws in several states, and draconian new penalties. Ambitious
prosecutors wondered what was stopping them from charging the
demonstrators with the crime of “rioting.” If any property was
damaged in the “riot,” all of those charged could be assessed a
share of the costs. The problem is that no one seems to care anymore
if this government behavior has a chilling effect on our
Constitutional rights to protest and associate with our fellows. This
will terrify anyone with a house, or money in the bank, into
immediate submission, or at least anticipatory obedience.
So,
the power of money, as either a taking of it, an unpaid fine as a
crime to be used as the basis for deportation, or a financial “Sword
of Damocles” to prevent access to future wealth, is not lost on our
sainted rulers.
(The
fines are about $800 per day, per immigrant in a sanctuary location.
According to abcnews.go.com, “ICE has had the authority to issue
civil fines for decades, but didn't begin using it until last
December.” All of this sanctuary activity also appeared on
apnews.com and washingtonpost.com. I read about it at nytimes.com on
July 4, 2019.)
The
terror of financial ruination, that's the main idea. You may, in
fact, be judgment-proof, which means that the lien on you will be
unenforceable, because you don't have any money or any thing that is
worth money. If you think about it, or get any good advice, you still
don't want a lien hanging over your head. If, someday, you get your
wheels back on the ground and want to buy a house, the mortgage will
not go through until the lien is cleared. Ditto for a loan to start a
business. Half a million dollars is a big lien.
Now
imagine a civil fine imposed on you by some federal agency for
criticizing the president. You know that this president would love to
punish every single American citizen who had ever said anything mean
about him. Any other president in history would laugh it all off,
probably mentioning people getting ten years in the Gulag for calling
Stalin “Uncle Mustache.” Trump's feeling are easier to hurt than
any previous president, and he always wants to get revenge for any
slight, however small. I'm starting to wonder if it is prudent for me
to say mean things about Trump on this blog, even though the low
readership will probably keep me safe.
Or
not! The number of eyes, or readers, or the hit-count of a blog, will
probably not be the trigger for such fines of retribution. No, the
buy-in will more likely be the fact of the offending statement
coupled with property or money in the bank. Why impose fines on the
judgment-proof when there are so many offenders with something to
steal? Unless, as is the case with the sanctuary immigrants, the
intention is simply to introduce the concept.
As
more and more of our Constitutional rights, freedoms, and privileges
slip away, almost anything becomes possible. Remember that something
like “free speech” only means what the Supreme Court says it
means. If they say that free speech does not cover criticism of the
president, well then it doesn't. It's just that simple. And if they
also say that fines are okay as punishment, then fines become
perfectly okay. This could all be administered by the United States
Secret Service, an armed agency with the power to arrest that is
charged with protecting the president and the rest of our leaders.
They now fall under the Department of Homeland Security, just like
ICE. Giving them the same authority to impose civil fines that ICE
already enjoys should not be difficult.
People
should really pay more attention to things like this. It is very easy
these days for too many people to say, “those people are here
illegally! ICE is just enforcing the law.” This kind of
ratification of horrible things like family separation, and putting
immigrants, including isolated children, into concentration camps,
and tons of other frightening things that would not have been
tolerated forty or fifty years ago, should not go unchallenged. These
things are wrong, and they violate all of the norms and traditions of
America as I understand them.
When
will people wake up to the danger that this presents to us, to all of
us? And to our children, and to our grandchildren? The sanctuary
churches are also breaking the law. Will people feel the same when
the churches are fined millions of dollars and their property is
seized to cover the judgment? What about after that, when fines are
being imposed for things that we cannot even imagine yet?
This
is a slippery slope. Our president seems to enjoy the chaos and the
bullying. The ICE agents are also having a great time, as we recently
discovered on their own social media outlets. Other federal agencies
could easily be brought in for some of the fun. America could turn
into a police state before you could say, “Jack Robinson.”
This
is all very disturbing, and it deserves more of people's attention.
Appendix
Number One:
Federal
Agencies with Police Powers
- The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);
- The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF);
- Homeland Security;
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE);
- Customs and Border Protection;
- The Treasury Police;
- The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA);
- The National Security Agency (NSA);
- The United States Secret Service;
- The United States Postal Police;
- The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA);
- The United States Marshall Service;
- The IRS Criminal Investigation Division;
- The Park Police;
- The Capitol Police;
- The Government Publication Office Police;
- The Office of Protective Services (for NASA);
- The Federal Reserve Board Police;
- The Mint Police; and
- The Bureau of Engraving and Printing Police.
The
list also includes all five branches of the military, with their
associated police elements (as seen on TV, i.e., NCIS: New Orleans),
and The Federal Bureau of Prisons. There are also forces that are
assigned to every branch of the government, and every federal agency.
All together, there are sixty-five (65) federal agencies that have
firearms and the power to arrest. (The number 65 comes from
“discoverpolicing.org,” a site that seems to be concerned with
police department accreditation and job availability. It is a very
pro-police site.)
No comments:
Post a Comment