When we say, “the Holocaust,” we all know what we’re talking
about. At the same time, it is one of
the least understood major events of the Twentieth Century. It’s certainly worth remembering, but a
question that needs to be asked is: who
are we remembering?
DISCLAIMER: NOTHING
THAT FOLLOWS SHOULD PERSUADE YOU THAT I AM SOME KIND OF HOLOCAUST DENIER, OR A
HOLOCAUST APOLOGIST, OR EVEN A HOLOCAUST MINIMIZER. I FULLY BELIEVE THAT IT HAPPENED, AND I
BELIEVE THAT THE NUMBERS THAT WE HEAR ARE CORRECT.
So, the question, or let’s say the two questions. For one thing, regarding the dead, who gets
included in the total? And regarding the
living, the survivors, who may be called a “Holocaust survivor?”
I cannot say that I have any specific knowledge of the dead,
except to say that the families left behind by my many American friends of
Polish, Belorussian or Ukrainian Jewish background must certainly have suffered
and died. But of the survivors, I got to
know one very well. His name was Jack,
and he was a client of mine. He believed
that he was qualified to receive German Social Security payments as a survivor,
and he was referred to me only because my file at the Santa Monica Bar
Association listed German as a language skill of mine.
I agreed to help him where previously no one had. The matter looked like a lot of work with a
very low chance of success, and as Abraham Lincoln said, and I paraphrase, time
is money for lawyers. I thought, let’s
give it a shot, this will be interesting.
And Jack was a great guy. Every
night he collected some food from restaurants, and bought more, and drove
around giving food to the homeless in Los Angeles. His only explanation was to say, “I’ve been
hungry, I didn’t like it.”
Jack was born in western Poland in the nineteen-teens to a
family that was Jewish, but not particularly religious, and German, and proud
of it. Mostly you’d say that they were
Polish though, the family had been there for many generations. In 1939 the Nazis and the Soviets divided
Poland after simultaneous invasions. Jack was in the half that the Nazis took over.
Of course the family knew what had been
going on in Germany, they knew about the bad treatment of the Jews of
Germany. Jack had a bad feeling about it
all and decided to flee to the Soviet zone.
One brother was convinced to join him, but the rest of the family chose
to stay put. What could happen? After all, the Germans had not yet started
any kind of program of killing Jews, and the family members were identifiable
as culturally German/Polish. Sure the
Nazis are a bunch of bastards, but these are the people of Goethe and
Beethoven!
So Jack said, “good luck,” and split with his brother on
foot. The brother got homesick almost
immediately and turned back, but Jack made it to the Soviet zone. It was all very dramatic, gunfire and hiding
in the woods were involved, but he made it.
The bad news is that everybody in Jack’s family, including
the brother, everybody but Jack, died in the ensuing Holocaust.
That’s the bad news, and actually, there’s no good news at
all. He lived, but only barely. The Soviets, of course, arrested him
immediately. He had blond hair and blue
eyes, and he spoke Polish and German, so to them he was obviously a spy. They sent him, and hundreds of thousands of
Poles from the Soviet sector, to concentration camps, probably in
Kazakhstan.
For a few years there Jack was very hungry, those Gulag
camps were hunger camps. Many prisoners
died of hunger, and prisoners survived by scheming to get enough food to live
on. Recalling this time years later,
Jack developed a lifelong interest in alleviating hunger, God bless him.
Later on he was chosen for some kind of Soviet sponsored
Polish Anti-Fascist Army, towards the end of the war the Soviets were making
plans for their take-over of eastern Europe.
After the war he emigrated to Israel where he fought against the English
mandate and later in the new Israeli Army.
(He knew Menachem Begin.) Eventually he emigrated to America, ending up
in Los Angeles.
So our first problem was this: even though German Social Security seemed, to
our understanding of their own materials, to include Jack in the group that
qualified for payments, they had consistently refused his applications for
years.
I was by training a lawyer, but I decided that the best
strategy here would be a public relations campaign. I contacted them by mail, letting them know
that I was now representing Jack, and please address all future correspondence
to me, and by the way, here are the reasons that I believe Jack qualifies and
could you please explain to me just how I am wrong? I wrote to them in English; they wrote to me
in German. They just stuck to their “no.”
I went to the Jewish community, the temples, the
newspapers. It was an interesting story,
and it got some play. Ari Noonan was a
reporter at the Jewish Times who was particularly sympathetic and helpful. I would send copies of the newspaper articles
to the Germans with cover letters. It
did finally work, and they put Jack on the roles, even paying the arrearages
back to the original application. It was
a good benefit.
We now encountered problem number two. The Times got some letters from L.A. Jews who
were angered by Jack’s case. “Who is
this guy claiming to be a Holocaust survivor?”
They acted like Jack was defiling the memories of those who had
died. Jack was from the wrong country,
wasn’t he? And he had certainly been in
the wrong camp system. (Perhaps they would
have given him some credit if they’d chosen to recall that his family had been
wiped out.)
I believe that those letter writers were victims of a common
misconception about the Holocaust, or a set of misconceptions. They
thought that the victims were German, and they thought that the victims were
gassed and cremated in the large, famous death camps. In the event, only two to three percent of
the victims were German. There had been
fewer than 500,000 Jews in Germany as of 1933, and more than half of them were
allowed to emigrate. Those that remained
were killed later on, in camps. The
total number of victims is generally agreed to be about six million, and I,
like most reasonable people, recognize that figure, but the remaining
ninety-seven percent of the Jewish victims of the Holocaust came from outside
Germany, most were Poles, Belorussians and Ukrainians. Something like fifty percent of those victims
were shot, not gassed, and they never saw even the gate of a camp, they were
simply marched outside of town and killed.
So is Jack a Holocaust survivor? He was from a country where over a million of
the recognized victims were killed, in the recognized way, and his family died with them. Did his act of running away and surviving
somehow remove him from consideration?
What about one of those rare few who escaped by jumping from the trains
taking them to the death camps? Should
they also be disqualified? What about the Jews that worked for Schindler? Or Ernst Leitz (Leica Cameras)?
It would be better if we agreed to define the category “victim
of the Holocaust” as generously as possible, and it would be better to do so not only for the dead,
but also for the survivors. Surely any Jew within a thousand miles whose
life was in jeopardy, and whose family members died, was a victim. Even if they survived, they were victims. Oddly, the spirit of the German Social
Security Code recognizes this to be true, even if some armchair historians do
not.
Postscript:
I chose to leave the Gypsies out of this discussion, but that doesn't mean that you can't bring it up. Actual Germans who were consigned to concentration camps but who were of categories other than "Jew" we can leave off. They survived in much greater percentages, being kept alive for their labor. For the Jews, on the other hand, and for the Gypsies too, the Nazis saw greater value in their deaths.
(Recommended reading:
“Bloodlands,” by Timothy Snyder, available anywhere that books are still
sold.)