There are seven or eight things that I could jump on regarding "Syrian Refugees," the new big thing. But I don't feel like it.
One thing worth mentioning, though, is that I happen to actually have a Syrian refugee friend. We were condo neighbors for a couple of years until I moved a few months ago. We're still in touch. I suppose he's not like these unfortunates that we see in the boats, with the crying, and the drowning, and the being chased across fields by Serbian police dogs. He can afford to wait out the refugee process living in a nice rented condo in Bangkok. He's a swell guy, about my age, the patriarch of a small group that includes a couple of nephews and their families. They are the nicest people that you'd ever want to meet.
My friend has had VISAs to America in the past, for business and travel purposes. He still has friends in America, regular Joes that he's worked with or done business with over the years. His home in Syria is an unattractive combination of rubble and flames for a couple of miles in every direction, punctuated by the odd explosion. When you see the video from Syria, do you ever consider what a horror it must be to try to get food and water for your family? Those people need a break. He's applying for the refugee VISA at the American Embassy here in Bangkok, and my fingers are crossed for him. With half of our elected officials in a desperate rush to give ISIS everything that they want, the odds seem to favor my friend getting shafted. ISIS hopes to make it as hard as possible for Syrians so that a) they can't leave in the first place; and b) they get treated as badly as possible wherever they land if they leave.
Man, I wish him luck, I hope he makes it. He and his relatives would be a fine addition to the American mosaic. Syrians are very good people, by the way. Educated, cosmopolitan and friendly. Our ignorant politicians should take a minute and try to meet and greet some Syrians before they make with the screaming paranoia. Reality doesn't go away simply because you chose to ignore it.
Showing posts with label ISIS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ISIS. Show all posts
Thursday, November 19, 2015
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
Post 9-11 Dreaming
This
long-planned post has become more relevant in light of the recent episode in
Paris. These tragic events happen all too
frequently, but they usually happen in places and to people that we don’t care
about. Google “terrorist attacks 2015”
for a startling picture of the vast toll of death and destruction that is
inflicted on people all over the world without our giving a shit. But let it happen in New York, or Paris, and
it’s Katy bar the door! Something must
be done! But what, pray tell? What must be done?
September 11, 2001
I awoke
that morning at 6:00 am in Los Angeles to the sound of NPR’s All Things
Considered on the clock radio. For a
change, something had happened. It has
always been a little joke for me to wake up, turn on some media, and mumble to
myself, “did anyone shoot the pope overnight?”
That was 9:00 am in New York, and the first tower had already been
hit. So I turned on the TV to CNN, and
the video was startling, totally amazing.
Surreal even, unreal, ludicrous!
I had a court appearance that morning so I got rolling as usual, but
with an eye on the TV. It got worse
quickly.
I saw the
second tower get hit, and the whole thing was obviously a big deal. I saw both of the towers come down, which was
shocking in the extreme. I lived in New
York when the towers were built. I went
to college in the immediate area when construction began. Before that, over the years, I had shopped in
the area. That was Christie Street, a
long block of ancient buildings housing mostly Jewish owned stores selling
electronic equipment. My father bought
me my first transistor radio there when I was ten or so years old. He took me again to buy me my first serious
set up for playing records, a Grundig radio and a Telefunken turntable
(matching weird jacks, you know). Now
here was the entire area lying in ruins at the hands of a group that seemed to
be well known. I remember thinking that
here it was, a moment where all that has happened before becomes the Old
World. Welcome to the New World!
But what
kind of New World would it be? That would depend on our response.
I drove to
the court appearance even though I’d heard that government buildings would be
closed. Just to be on the safe
side. In the car I listened to more news
and considered the possible responses, likely, preferred and ideal. I considered people’s emotions, including
anger and sympathy, good will, and admiration for the first responders. It wouldn’t have taken a rocket scientist to
figure out what was coming. But what
would be the ideal response?
My Ideal Response
I had very
strong opinions very quickly about what should be done. There were two immediate problems: 1) rebuilding the site; and 2) knocking the
wind out of those angry Muslims.
What to do
about the buildings was the easy part. If
it were up to me, I would have re-built the Twin Towers substantially the way they
had been as quickly as possible. Maybe
change up the construction a bit to avoid what may have been weaknesses in the
design, but remake them visually the same as they were. Let the world see how fast America can build
huge structures, top them off, put a flag on top, and say to all observers, we’re
back. That would have been quite a
show.
In the
event, they cleared the site fast enough, too fast in fact, fast enough to lend
credence to the conspiracy crowd, but after that the process dragged on
interminably. That kind of disagreement
and uncertainty and hesitation looks like weakness, and people were
watching. It was an embarrassment.
What to do
about the angry Muslims was more challenging.
I quickly settled on a two-track response as ideal. Above the table, my recommendation was
all-love, all-the-time. An outreach to the
Muslim world, with the message that we obviously have some differences, let’s
address them, we’re here to help in any way that we can, we’re sorry if there
have been misunderstandings. Tell the
world, what can we do to help Muslim people?
I would have spent good money on things like water projects; disease
eradication programs; education assistance; farm aid; even infrastructure
programs. All in close cooperation with
local governments, where there were effective local governments. Not only the usual
suspects, but also those with whom we had had less than wonderful
relations. Like Iran, maybe Iraq and Syria. More with non-oil countries, because they need the help more. And wave American Muslims
around like a flag. An American
flag. You are here; we are us; all men
are brothers. That kind of thing. That’s above the table.
Of course
the people responsible for 9/11 were Muslim, and of course there would need to
be a reckoning. But I felt at the time,
and I still think, that it would be best to keep the worst of the violence
under the table. Exaggerate, through
misinformation, the fact that there were multiple factions of angry
Muslims. Make people think that the situation is much worse than it is. Make even the angry Muslims
themselves believe that there are factions that disagree with them and have
violent intentions. Make some known
angry militants unaccountably rich, and blame it on collaboration. Release doctored video, pictures and banking
records that incriminate suspected perpetrators. Sow confusion among the jihadists, and then
let them begin to mysteriously die. Make
them believe that their killers are other angry Muslims who are perhaps jealous
of their successes, or were apostates, or were spies. Disappearances and deaths, and let the world
believe that the angry Muslims are killing each other. Maybe the angry Muslims themselves would believe
it, or would be unsure. Just do it
quietly, off-stage, and without being noticed.
Drive home
the nail without using a hammer. Don’t
be Rambo; be Penn and Teller. Couldn’t
we have done that?
Maximum Importance Alert!
There are
two things here that must be stressed as being totally, wildly important, two
things that should have occurred to everyone as MUST DO things.
For one
thing, preserve and develop all of that worldwide good will at all costs. The entire world, even countries that usually
worked against our interests, was sympathetic to America in that magic
moment. It would have been smart to have
done anything and everything possible to nurture that good will and use it as
an opportunity to improve relations with many countries where such a thing was
possible. Countries like Iran, for instance. They were sympathetic! We could have found common ground and
improved relations! But no.
Instead we
launched two “Crusader” wars that were total, abject failures, throwing away
trillions of dollars and achieving nothing good, sowing, instead, the seeds of
ISIS and a long laundry list of terrible things that we will still be paying
for decades from now. We arrogantly
pissed off people all around the world, friend and foe alike. Oh, and we famously tortured people,
egregiously and viciously. I mean, in
the name of Sweet Baby Jesus! Couldn’t
we at least have kept that a secret?
Secondly,
when terrible people do terrible things, and you know exactly what they want
and why they did it, please DO NOT GIVE THEM THE THINGS THAT THEY WANT!
This last
thing constantly amazes me. The
Palestinians launch a few small rockets into Israel, rockets that mostly
explode harmlessly in some corn field somewhere. What do they want? They want Israel to retaliate and kill some
Palestinian civilians. So what does
Israel do? They retaliate with massive,
concentrated firepower and blow up whole neighborhoods of civilians. The Palestinians are big winners. On 9/11 it was the same. Al Qaeda wanted to prove that there was a war
between Muslims and the Western Democracies.
Our response was to invade at least two Muslim countries and kill huge
numbers of Muslims, thus proving Al Qaeda’s point. Watching this happen time after time is
discouraging. Oye, vey ist mir, are our
leaders stupid or what? (Hint: they’re
stupid.)
So Now, Paris
ISIS itself
might be something of a mystery, but their goals in this Paris attack are not
mysterious at all. They want to
discourage European countries from accepting refugees from their
territory. They want to make life harder
for Muslims in Europe so that more of them can be radicalized. They want Europe and America to unleash more
military power on them, preferably sending ground troops, so that they can show
the world that the “Crusaders” are invading the Dar Al Islam. So what is the response so far? New restrictions on refugees; increased hostility
to Muslims in Europe and America; and military action, including talk of
sending ground troops. They Shoot! They score! Militant Islam wins again!
It’s enough
to make a sensible person despair.
Friday, July 4, 2014
The New Guys On The Mesopotamian Block
"Large swaths of North-Eastern Iraq taken over by ISIS." Remember that news from a few week ago?
ISIS being the "Islamic State of Iraq and Syria." Or was. These guys are very sophisticated in many ways, it's clear. They do a good job with the social media and public relations in general. But they missed the boat when they changed their name. Repeatedly, I might add.
ISIS was a great name. It sounds great, and the association with the ancient Egyptian goddess Isis didn't hurt. These guys didn't feel that way.
First, they started to quibble about he entire historical validity of Syria. They have a major hair across their collective asses about the Sykes-Picot map, created in 1916 by England and France. That map created the countries of Iraq and Syria out of what was, up until World War I, the Ottoman entity called the Levant. So the ISIS crowd changed their name to "The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant," ISIL for short.
At that point somebody must have remembered that they'd forgotten to jettison the colonial entity of Iraq as well. So they did. The name was changed to "The Islamic State."
"The Islamic State" has a certain elegance to it, undoubtedly. I still prefer ISIS though. Charm still means something in Fred World.
ISIS being the "Islamic State of Iraq and Syria." Or was. These guys are very sophisticated in many ways, it's clear. They do a good job with the social media and public relations in general. But they missed the boat when they changed their name. Repeatedly, I might add.
ISIS was a great name. It sounds great, and the association with the ancient Egyptian goddess Isis didn't hurt. These guys didn't feel that way.
First, they started to quibble about he entire historical validity of Syria. They have a major hair across their collective asses about the Sykes-Picot map, created in 1916 by England and France. That map created the countries of Iraq and Syria out of what was, up until World War I, the Ottoman entity called the Levant. So the ISIS crowd changed their name to "The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant," ISIL for short.
At that point somebody must have remembered that they'd forgotten to jettison the colonial entity of Iraq as well. So they did. The name was changed to "The Islamic State."
"The Islamic State" has a certain elegance to it, undoubtedly. I still prefer ISIS though. Charm still means something in Fred World.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)