Last
week the New York Times announced that they would begin capitalizing
the “black” in “Black Americans” immediately. This was a
break from convention. The word “Negro” has always been
capitalized; African-American has naturally been capitalized; the
word black, as applied to American Negroes, has not. So this was kind
of a big deal. (For reference, “white” has also by long tradition
been rendered in all lower case letters.)
I
don't read all of the still-available newspapers from America,
neither those of the USA Today variety, nor the undead remnants of
local newspapers like the L.A. Times, etc. If I did, I would have
noticed that other papers had already made the shift. It will come as
a surprise to no one that I find this annoying.
My
guidance in using the term “black Americans” came not only from
dictionaries and style books, but also from its usage by W.E.B. Du
Bois, author of, inter alia, “The Souls of Black Folk,” and from
the personal experience of being scolded by black, not Black, friends
on a website from the early 2010s that I was extremely fond of,
called “We Are Respectable Negroes.” (The irony, take my word for
it, was intentional.) The outpouring of racism and white supremacy
that accompanied President Obama's time in office had piqued my
interest in the subject of racism in America. There were vigorous
daily conversations in the comment threads, and I joyfully
participated. Long time readers of this blog may remember that
somewhere around 2013 I switched from “Black” to “black.” I
had been capitalizing Black, because I felt that “black” seemed
disrespectful. I had been doing that on this blog for four years
already, and race has always been a frequent topic of mine. Black
Americans are so much more than their color. There is a proud history
there, and a deep, shared culture. Shared, in fact, with the rest of
us Americans; American culture itself has been shaped and molded
importantly by its black, or Black, components. The black American
experience is unique among the black skinned members of the race Homo
Sapiens. Strictly in the interest of uniformity, I also capitalized
“White.” That was the deal breaker for my friends on the web
site, and they were kind enough to gently educate me on the subject.
They
would, all of them, cheerfully tolerate the small “black” to
avoid the capital “White.” They had no objections to black. It
was, after all, the common usage among black writers and civil rights
leaders. “White” was a must to avoid, smacking so strongly of
White Power, etc.
I
read the Time's announcement with a snarl on my lips, thinking that
it must be part of this “New Woke Vocabulary” that we are all
being forced to adopt. This annoyed me, although the reasons given by
the Times were similar to my feelings before being corrected by
friends. My first question was: will White also be capitalized?
The
answer, of course, is no. That would be white supremacism! Here is a
quote from the Time's coverage of Trump's “press conference” at
the White House yesterday:
“he
denied that Black Americans suffered from police brutality more than
white Americans.”
Google
Results:
The
Diversity Style Guide
The
subject is addressed at some length on diversitystyleguide.com.
'...most
journalism style guides, like those of the Associated Press and the
New York Times, call for putting both “white” and “black” in
all lowercase letters.' So we can assume that this wave of change has
only recently arisen from the always shifting currents of language.
“The
National Association of Black Journalists does not capitalize Black
in its publications, including the NABJ Style Guide.”
“The
Chicago Manual of Style [allows] capitalization if an author or
publication prefers.”
All
of this suggests that the proposed change is controversial, and that
the whole matter is currently in a state of flux.
The
Atlantic Magazine
There
is a big article addressing this matter in the June 18, 2020 issue.
You can find it at theatlantic.com.
The
article recognizes that the capitalization of Black leading to the
capitalization of White is problematic. It also mentions that using
Black to apply to Black Americans with the “same shared culture and
experiences,” i.e. the long experience of American slavery and its
aftermath, leaves out many black American citizens. Much of the
article is devoted to shedding light on some of these problems.
(Fred's
editorial comments) I might add, that simply calling the more
recently arrived black immigrants “African-Americans” leaves out
Jamaicans, for one thing. I think that it's also worth remembering
that any visually black person in America is going to be treated with
the same bad humor, the same discrimination, and the same contempt,
regardless of where they came from or when.
The
entire effort to categorize human beings by color is difficult and
problematic. Toes will be stepped on. Take the example of Americans
from Indian backgrounds who happen to be Tamils. Many Tamils are
among the darkest skinned people in the world, although technically
they may think of themselves as Indians, and thus Caucasians.
Something similar may happen when I say the word, “Polynesian.”
You may already be picturing people whose skin is a cheerful copper
color. There are many thousands of islands involved, and the
inhabitants of many of them are rather dark skinned.
Oregon
Live!
I
found a recent letter to oregonlive.com. The letter was posted July
2, 2020, and referred to the site's recent switch to “Black,”
while sticking with “white.” The writer felt like this new
editorial policy was “a slap in the face to white people.”
I
could make a joke about which side of the Cascades the letter writer
hailed from, but this is a serious matter. America has suffered a
huge increase in vocal, demonstrative racism since President Obama
was elected. Half of white Americans said, “that's great!” and
the other half went crazy. Much of the racist poison that had been
kept under a lid boiled over, and the problem is still growing.
Failed President DJT loves to stoke the racist fires at every
opportunity. (“Confederate flags are free speech!” “Police kill
more white people than black!”) Witness all of the Confederate and
Nazi flags now in evidence, at Trump rallies and elsewhere.
We
don't need to be looking for ways to recruit more white supremacists.
Cost
Benefit Analysis:
What
are the costs and benefits of switching at this delicate moment from
black and white to Black and White, or Black and white?
Does
the benefit envisioned accrue to black Americans? Is it intended to
be a marker of their value, or of our love for them? I cannot presume
to speak for black Americans, but the black Americans that I know
share a few characteristics. They are hard-nosed realists, for one
thing. They will not be influenced by semantic changes, living, as
they do, in a world that is crying out for major changes addressing
very real problems. They are also a bit suspicious by nature, having
long experienced the differences between what the (white) authorities
say, and what they do. Do not expect any big benefit from an
outpouring of good will in either direction on the issue of Black vs.
black. Blacks will not be swayed by tiny changes in grammar
masquerading as encomiums.
Is
there a Cost? If there were any chance at all that capitalizing Black
would push the current tendency towards growing racism in American
culture, I would shit-can the entire idea so fast that its head would
spin.
No comments:
Post a Comment