As
you travel down the scale of the prestige of the court there is a
corresponding reduction in the need for sartorial perfection. Having
said that, even in one of the lesser state courts that are devoted to
some narrow corner of the law a lawyer is expected to dress
respectfully.
In
any state court you can wear a nice sports jacket and slacks with a
colored shirt and you'll get away with it every day. As long as the
tie is not loose and none of the colors are too wild you will pass
the hearing without comment from the judge. Even there, though, it's
a good idea to fasten one button on the jacket when you stand up.
Judges appreciate the gesture, even if they would let it slide if you
didn't.
In
any Federal court, you really do have to dress up a bit, and you need
to be very careful about that button. I worked on one case with two
lawyers from Texas, and I attended their first hearing in the local
Federal court. One of them wore a nice suit in a dark color, with a
white shirt and a quiet tie. The other wore a very nice sports jacket
and very dressy slacks, in subdued colors, with a white shirt and a
conservative tie. He told me later he always does that at first
status conferences to learn something about the judge.
The
hearing went for about fifteen minutes, and when all of the business
was done the judge spoke to the under-dressed lawyer. “Counsel,”
at least the judge addressed him as counsel, that's a good start, “do
you own a suit?”
Taken
a little aback, the lawyer said, “why, yes, your honor.”
"Please
wear it next time.”
Those
Federal court judges can be funny. Some of them are angered by
double-breasted suits. Most lawyers in Federal court are careful
about what they wear, and careful about fastening that all important
button, too.
Our
fabulous “President Sparky the Wonder Horse's Ass” never fastens
a button on his suit jackets. I'm sure that it's part of a grand
plan. He wears those custom made, super long ties in shiny single
colors, so long that they descend almost to the rise in his pants,
and he never buttons his jacket. I would bet you good money that he
decided at some point that it was a look that made him appear less
fat than he is.
I'm
sure that reasoning is shared by his customary way of always sitting
forward with his elbows on his knees as though he were on the toilet.
He's afraid that if he sits back, or even sits up straight, his giant
belly will show in the pictures.
I
will not even address his hairdo, or his make-up, preferring to leave
such sensitive matters to experts.
None
of this is any surprise. He is a vain man, and like any other big,
fat, pasty skinned, lumpy, knock-kneed, out of shape vain old man he
is sensitive about his lost looks. Not that he was ever a handsome
man to begin with, but nature and time push us all down the scale
from where we started out.
Trump's
unbuttoned jacket bothers me every time. I learned as a lawyer that
the manner in which one dresses is always an expression of respect,
or the lack of respect. The way one dresses for court; to meet with
clients; to attend depositions or meetings in the offices of other
attorneys. It's all the same. If you are any kind of gentleman, you
are expected to dress appropriately to show respect for the legal
process, the judges, opposing counsel, clients, any observers that
may be on hand, and respect for yourself as well. I look at Trump's
unbuttoned jacket and I see disrespect. He wears the dark suits
because he believes that they hide his weight problem. If he thought
that track-suits were more flattering, he'd wear them everywhere. He
leaves the jacket unbuttoned for the same reason, but the message
remains: I have no respect for you.
This
is only my opinion, of course, but I don't think that it will meet a
lot of counter-argument, because the man obviously doesn't respect
any damn body or any damn thing at all.
At
this point, I almost wish that the military would step in and throw
all of our government officials in some rough-ass camp somewhere for
re-education. I wish they'd just take over and run the country. They
could leave the courts and the police in place with some new
instructions, and they could leave the rich in place as long as they
smiled and kept their mouths shut. The military's version of a future
for the United States would almost certainly be much closer to core
American values than the version that the politicians are working
desperately hard to achieve. The generals and admirals could hardly
do worse than this bunch of pirates now in charge, and they could
hardly do more damage to American traditions or culture. This
solution is currently in place in many countries around the world
where the politicians had clearly demonstrated that they cannot be
trusted. The system often works fine. The military may guide the
country back to democracy or not, depending on the likelihood of the
returning politicians just resuming their destructive mischief. It
might be worth a try.
That's
what I think on good days. On bad days, I believe that the only
workable solution for the world's problems would be to blast the
entire planet down to bedrock and eject every molecule of the
atmosphere and the oceans into space. Make it a lifeless rock in the
void. Some days I think that's all that we deserve.
No comments:
Post a Comment