One side of the current political stand-off in America is
all about the opportunity. The poster
child for this point of view could be Willard “Mitt” Romney, who never tired of
telling people that they should “borrow money from (their) parents” and start a
business. We don’t have an income
inequality problem, goes the chant, we have an opportunity problem. If we would only lower taxes to almost
nothing, and get rid of these pesky regulations, Americans will be free to
create wonderful business entities that will thrive and bring about a golden
age of prosperity for all. Just who
these creators are is never made clear.
The suggestion is that anyone could do it. Anyone who would sit quietly for long enough
could come up with some wonderful idea, and if the business climate were right
anyone with a wonderful idea could take the market by storm and become
wealthy. It’s not that simple, I think
we can all agree on that.
“Vote for me, and I’ll make it possible for you to get
rich.” That doesn’t work on me, probably
because I know a few things about people.
You’d have to be stupid to believe it (he said with uncharacteristic
directness). If you believe it, I’d like
to sell you a desk-top machine that changes plain paper into ten dollar
bills.
I know a few relatively successful entrepreneurs, and one
fabulously successful one, and we all hear the stories of the famous ones. Bill Gates; the Steves over at Apple; Mark Zuckerberg
(sp?); the Dominos guy; the Papa John’s guy.
Some had new ideas; some knew a good idea when they saw it; and some
figured that people love pizza enough that they will buy any crap if it’s cheap
and easy enough. There’s a lot more to it
than an idea or business model that seems to have a good chance at success.
You need to have THE ENTREPRENEURIAL PERSONALITY. Probably the entrepreneurial temperament too,
but I’m not an expert in the difference.
Certainly there must be books on the subject, but I don’t
want to look at any, and I don’t even want to visit Amazon to see how many
there are. I definitely don’t want to
read about it. I always prefer to
re-invent the wheel in these matters.
So I went to the park, and I took paper along, and that’s
where I wrote this list (sorry, Randy).
1. An entrepreneur
must be DARING. How daring? I’d say that anyone who was the least bit
risk-adverse need not apply. The stress
would kill them. Starting up a new
business takes money, often lots of money, and you might lose the entire
bundle. Catastrophic if it’s your money,
terrible if it was provided by loved ones or friends, and no fun at all even if
it came from strangers. Then there’s the
potential for embarrassment.
2. An entrepreneur
must be DETAIL ORIENTED. The
entrepreneur must make a detailed plan, and must develop a very clear idea of
how the enterprise will be made to work.
The attention to detail must be almost compulsive, almost an
obsession. Anything less will almost
certainly result in failure. It’s a
version of Murphy’s Law: if something can go wrong, it probably will.
3. An entrepreneur must be ENERGETIC. There are never enough hours in a day for a
true entrepreneur. There is so much to
be done, and time is always of the essence.
If an entrepreneur takes a nap, it is always a ten minute power-nap
after working all night.
4. An entrepreneur
must be FLEXIBLE (ADAPTIVE). In the
course of bringing a commercial idea to life, one will always discover
imperfections in the original plan. The
entrepreneur must be able to spot these and must be prepared to make
alterations on the fly.
5. An entrepreneur
must be bursting with SELF-CONFIDENCE. The
entrepreneur must have the strong belief that an enterprise conceived, planned
and put together by them can be successful.
More than that, it WILL be successful.
Any weakness here puts the entire thing in doubt.
Most people are simply not cut out to be entrepreneurs. They just don’t have it in them. They lack some combination of the drive, the
temperament, the talent, the energy or the shear will to do it.
For example, in terms of the five attributes listed, I
possess only flexibility. I am never
afraid to admit that an original idea was flawed, and I can be pretty good at
making adjustments. I have a high
tolerance for ambiguity, but that may not even be the same thing as the
flexibility required of an entrepreneur.
So, one, or none, out of five, making me a terrible candidate for the
role of entrepreneur. I have, in fact,
tried it, and the enterprise failed. (No
spectacularly, but it failed, and I pulled the plug.)
Most people just want to have a job and live in peace with their
families. I have always been one of
them. These people, we, should not be
criticized for this desire to function only in the commercial scheme of someone
else’s vision. It is not a failure of
any kind, certainly not a moral failure.
It is terribly unfair to denigrate people who do not wish to take
commercial (financial) risks as “takers.”
(As opposed to “job creators.”)
AND YES, I am writing this in fervent opposition to the
current vogue for Free-Market this-and-that, privatization of every single
thing from National Parks to Social Security, deregulation of business, and
kleptocracy in all of its manifestations.
I find myself in passionate opposition to the Republican Party, so-called Conservatives, the
Neo-Conservatives, the Neo-Liberals, to the mewing hypocrites who pass for
Liberals these days, to (God help us!) the Libertarians, the Ayn Randers, to
those Neo-Birchers the Tea Party, and yes, to those weak sisters who now pass
themselves off as the Democratic Party.
If that sounds like everybody to you, read the list
again. Plenty of people are left out,
people of whom I approve. I’ll let you
figure out who they are.
To our current crop of elected officials, those sleek-coated,
self-interested progeny of Blackbeard and Morgan the Pirate, I say: favor the entrepreneurs (corporate interests)
if you will, but ignore the common man at your peril. There are many more of us, and when the time
comes and we finally have nothing left to lose, we may even wake up.
2 comments:
You must also have all of the "almost impossible" qualities of an entrepreneur to be a good revolutionary... but it's much more dangerous. Easier just to recognize that no matter what you choose in life, you'll have to make the commitment to work at it to be good at it.. and you will be rewarded according to your willingness to do so. Or not. The article makes it sound like the ability to succeed is a "genetic" thing... but one of the basic tenants of free enterprise and belief in oneself, is that it's NOT what you were born with... it's what to made of it.
No, it's not genetics. It's not a matter of IQ and strength. But it is matter of temperament and personality. Temperament comes first. You can see it in babies too young to pick up their heads or turn over. Some are adventurous and some are fearful. Personality comes later on, after experience. What you say is true, John, life is what you make of it. Some people just want to make a simple, peaceful, risk-free environment for themselves. They deserve our respect too.
Post a Comment